One interesting thing about people is that their perception and worldviews are a direct product of how they take in information
. You’ve probably heard the story of the three blind men trying to figure out what an elephant is. A blind man touched the leg of an elephant and concluded that the elephant was like the trunk of a large tree. One touched the tooth and concluded that the elephant was a spear and the last one touched the trunk and concluded that the elephant must be some kind of moving snake.
And then again the kind of information they take.
Similarly, people see the world in different ways that make sense to them given their ways of seeing and knowing and processing the information available to them. There are at least two ways
to take information. The old way is to hear and hear – like a self-taught mechanic who knows how to fix an engine but can’t tell you how it works. Lao Tsu would agree. The new way is to give words to our experiences and talk. This presents a problem in the way that when I say “dog” you hear me say “dog” – are we talking about one dog? This way of importing information ignores experience and instead puts it into a linguistic framework that can be words, ideas, or feelings or values. A person can ignore his experience to the extent that he can no longer tie his own shoelaces. There are also at least two ways to reach conclusions that lead to actions. Both start with certain values but one system prioritizes values according to how they do and other people feel and the other prioritizes values according to the rules of thinking.
A personality trait is to have an early opinion when 20 percent of the information is given and then supporting information is used to emphasize one’s original conclusion while the contrary information is ignored. This is a quick way to make people more decisive which is good in an emergency but it is also a way to ensure that people stay wrong for a long time.
Another very human trait is to value recent knowledge more than historical knowledge or worse, to value more than “what can be seen”. The latter causes a large amount of confusion. One might say that the whole field of economics is dedicated to solving this problem (the broken window fallacy), at least after a few beers. In physics this universal problem is solved using wave functions; it is often presented in another way as many worlds is one way to interpret wave action.
I’m willing to bet money (I wouldn’t win all the time but I would win more often than not) that if you believe in all full resonance fields or collective consciousness or if you believe that there is something bigger than yourself but you can’t pinpoint it, or if you’re always looking for answers, you’re probably ignoring what happened and you think about valuing your endings the way they make you feel. You just “know” there is something bigger than you. On the other hand, if you continue to ignore the experience of the world around you, that is, you continue to philosophize but use reason, you are forced to conclude that there are no things greater than yourself and those that can be understood (because if you can’t understand, it doesn’t matter, see?
😉
) which means you “own” or control them and you are no longer afraid. If you’re used to dealing with things you probably did like everyone else. The reason is that since you don’t spend much time in your world, that is, your head, you will spend time in other people’s world. He will talk about “what everyone is talking about”.
Yes, everyone is a slave to their own creation.
You may think you know the truth, but do you?
The most effective prison is the one you can’t see, your brain.
Copyright © 2007-2023 earlyretirementextreme.com This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only. Use of this feed on other websites violates copyright. If you see this notice somewhere other than your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing a copyright violation. Some sites use random name changing algorithms to hide the origin. Find the original, unadulterated version of this post at earlyretirementextreme.com. (Digital fingerprint: 47d7050e5790442c7fa8cab55461e9ce)First posted 2009-06-11 00:05:10.
Source link
